Ark-e-Gulab,  Blog,  Religion and Philosophy

Kaashif and Baatin on Love

What does it mean to say that if there is a tinge of attachment it is not real Love?

Kaashif

Real Love is selfless. There is no attachment, you don’t need the person anymore.

Baatin

How can “no attachment” be possible?

Kaashif

At the “real” level of Love, you are not attached to the person but the person’s “being”. And that is how “no attachment” is possible.

Baatin

Separation from the beloved shouldn’t hurt then.

Kaashif

The “being” of the person never goes. The beloved always “is” once she “has been”, she cannot “not be”, for a person who has “been” will always “be”, he can never “not be”.

Baatin

What about feelings? They cannot go!

Kaashif

There are no feelings at the “real” level. And at the level just before the “real” level there can only be longing, longing for union, longing for “merger”.

Baatin

And this happens inside a person? If my beloved is separated, I am still in “merger” with her? You don’t long for her, for you are one, not two different “beings”?

Kaashif

It is a state of being, it cannot be said to be going on “inside” a person. In “real” love the beloved never seperated. Her “being” is now a part of your “being” and in that Celebrate!

Baatin

These feelings change. You meet another person. You feel for her.

Kaashif

Feelings always change, and the state, and the stations always change. The “end” of love is the beginning of Love. The “journey” starts when you annihilate yourself and her into one. Everything till now was a kind of preparation or homework. The real work, the real Love begins now.

Baatin

Can you feel for another person even after merger?

Kaashif

Initially for her “skin”. Her skin is nothing but the extention of her material being.

Baatin

How can that be possible! You have already merged!

Kaashif

The “merged” feels for the new person. If you stay at the same level and never rise, the loop goes on forever. You meet, you merge, you meet again, you merge again. The only solution is to rise above. Find your Sheikh!

Baatin

This concludes that the old lover, the one you were in merger with, can be replaced by someone new.

Kaashif

Can be and cannot be.

Baatin

In what case “can be”?

Kaashif

Can be at the material level.

Baatin

In what case “cannot be”?

Kaashif

At the “real” level of the merger, the new one merges with what the older one has become. What has the older one become? He has become what he has become after the merger of what he was and what his beloved was.

Baatin

Tell me the secret.

Kaashif

Every moment is a “becoming”. You cannot “unbecome” what you have “become”. This moment has just merged into you. You cannot separate it from what you “became” once the moment merged into your previous “being”. You can add more moments and keep on merging in them. The only way to stop is to stop. Timelessness!

Baatin
Liked it? Take a second to support us on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

2 Comments

  • Irtiza Fayaz

    Regarding the construct referred here as a person’s “being”: For me I would say a more apt way to put it would be ‘perception of being’ or ‘idea of being’. The beloved is nothing but an excuse, or you could call them a source, for us to find something exalted that transcends the limits of being. Any form of ‘true love’ cannot be limited to just the confines of personhood, since a person is a material being, and love for the material cannot be true. Loving a person for just existing, therefore, is just as materialistic and hence not true, as loving a person for their qualities, because in the end, you’re in love with the existence of a material entity.

    You could argue that there may be something metaphysical that exists in a being that transcends the material plane, and can be the object of true love. But here we are limited, again, by our senses and perception. The same way ideas behind words cannot be conveyed in their truest, purest sense, does the metaphysical essence remain elusive, for it cannot be touched, seen, heard, or tasted in totality. To claim that one can experience true love with the husk of a person’s metaphysical being is delusional.

    So what remains of that which can be truly loved? You can only ever fall for your perception of a being, and when that perception reveals a greater transcendental truth to you, do you truly experience love. And since the truth is revealed to you through the being, they become beloved.

    To be continued…

    • Sull Kaak

      Paragraph 1: Sense of being could be immaterial. And where love (material) ends, Love (immaterial) starts.

      Paragraph 2: Being could be a metaphysical entity. Metaphysical entities could be felt by the “perceiver” through intuitive feeling.

      Paragraph 3: The “end” of love is the beginning of Love. The “journey” starts when you annihilate yourself and her into one. Everything till now was a kind of preparation or homework. The real work, the real Love begins now.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.